top of page

GITA GO GLOBAL Group

Public·21 members

A History Of Ukraine [CRACKED]


First published in 1996, A History of Ukraine quickly became the authoritative account of the evolution of Europe's second largest country. In this fully revised and expanded second edition, Paul Robert Magocsi examines recent developments in the country's history and uses new scholarship in order to expand our conception of the Ukrainian historical narrative.




A History of Ukraine



Ukraine under Khrushchev The sixties phenomenonEconomic developmentsThe Brezhnev era—stability and st 'A magisterial history ... of the Ukrainian land and all the peoples who have fought over, thrived in, and suffered upon it, from the ancient Scythians ... to the present day.' Robert Legvold, Foreign Affairs 'Reminiscent of some of the great works of Russian and Ukrainian history of the nineteenth century ... The book is characterized by wide and deep learning, remarkable objectivity, rational organization, clarity of presentation, and profound awareness of a variety of national sensitivities.' Dennis R. Papazian, History 'The task of writing a new history of Ukraine is a difficult balancing act ... Not only the end of the Cold War and the gradual reintegration of Eastern Europe into the European community but also the rethinking of the nation-state and nationalism as historical forces challenge the ways in which the teaching and writing of modern history have been structured. Magocsi's History will long serve as a model for those who dare to grapple with these central issues.' Mark von Hagen, The Journal of Modern History 'Magocsi's mastery of ethnographic material, his skillful inclusion of primary documents, and the valuable annotated bibliography make his work [a] useful and comprehensive tool for the student of Ukraine.' Paul S. Pirie, The Slavic and East European Journal Slavic Studies


To have a better understanding of the present and look into the future, weneed to turn to history. Certainly, it is impossible to cover in this articleall the developments that have taken place over more than a thousand years. ButI will focus on the key, pivotal moments that are important for us to remember,both in Russia and Ukraine.


In essence, Ukraine's ruling circles decided to justify their country's independence through the denial of its past, however,except for border issues. They began to mythologize and rewrite history, editout everything that united us, and refer to the period when Ukraine was part of the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union as an occupation. The common tragedy of collectivization and famine of the early 1930s was portrayed as the genocide of the Ukrainian people.


Q. Language, spelling and pronunciation used in reports can at times take on additional, unintended meaning. What pitfalls should be avoided by international reporters not so familiar with Ukraine and its history?


Then in the 18th century, you start having this discourse about Great Russia, which is Russia, Little Russia, which would be Ukraine, and White Russia, which is Belarus. This kind of discourse very much originated from Russia. And it was a sort of proto-nationalising discourse, something that was trying to define the state alongside common culture and language and tradition and history and so on.


In the history of the Holocaust, the summer and fall of 1941 are especially significant because they represent a period of critical escalation. In a matter of months mobile Nazi killing units, which had begun shooting all adult male Jews during the invasion of the Soviet Union, expanded to include a genocide targeting women, children, and entire Jewish communities.


On July 26 and 27, 2022, the Center for Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies (CSEEES) hosted a two-day workshop that introduced 30 K-12 and community college educators from 12 states to the culture and history of Ukraine. The participants heard presentations from Dr. Nicholas Breyfogle (Department of History) and Dr. Alisa Ballard Lin (Department of Slavic and East European Languages and Cultures) who presented on Ukrainian history and culture, respectively. The participating educators were also given the opportunity to talk about the presentations in small groups and received contact hours, stipends, and six books on Ukrainian culture and history for completing the workshop.


Ukrainian books and periodicals in history, geography and culture are especially important for Belarus and Russia, since for centuries (i.e., the 10th-13th centuries) these countries were under the influence of Ukrainian (called at that time Kievan Rus') culture and church activities.


Periodicals (official and unofficial) published in Ukraine during Glasnost and Perestroika provide important information on this particular period in Ukrainian history as well on developments in other parts of the USSR in the late-Soviet period. Finally, Ukrainian publications in the period of independence are major sources about important policy issues, e.g., the Crimea question, Chornobyl, and the development of independent Ukraine's relations with the outside world.


The Library's Ukrainian collection began with the acquisition of Thomas Jefferson's personal library in 1815. Although his chief European interest was France, Jefferson collected works from or about other European countries. The Library's earliest Ukraine- related book was a three-part history of different parts of Ukraine written by Comte Jan Potocky: Historie ancienne du gouvernement de Cherson (St. Petersburg, 1804); Historie ancienne du gouvernement de Podolie (1805); and Historie ancienne du gouvernement de Wolhynie (1805). A copy of the book was presented to Jefferson by the author, and was sent through Levett Harris, the United States Consul in St. Petersburg, on August 10, 1808.


Apart from a few such early items, the first books on Ukraine reached the Library of Congress in the late 1860s. In his history of the Library of Congress, David C. Mearns furnished evidence that some publications from Russia came directly to Washington as early as 1868 since, at that time, many Ukrainian books were published in Russia proper (e.g., in Moscow, St. Petersburg, Saratov, and other cities). Early acquisitions worth mentioning are the Malorusskii literaturnyi sbornik, edited by D. I. Mordovtsev (Saratov, 1859); O narodnoi odezhde i ubranstve rusinov, by I. F. Holovats'kyi (detached article from an unknown magazine of the 1870s); and the journal Pravda, published in L'viv in 1868-1880.


Valuable 19th century publications concerning Ukraine also were included in the Yudin Collection, such as the complete set of an important journal of Ukrainian history, literature, folklore, and language, Kievskaia Starina. The Library of Congress is the only library in the Western hemisphere in possession of a complete set of Kievskaia Starina with Index. Other noteworthy serials are the Chteniia Istoricheskogo obshchestva Nestora Letopistsa and the Chteniia Moskovskogo obshchestva istorii i drevnostei rossiiskikh pri Moskovskom Universitete. The latter publication has three volumes of indexes for the years 1882-1901.


The history of Ukraine is represented in the Yudin Collection by Istoriia Malorossii by N. A. Markevych (Moscow, 1842); Ukrainian ethnology is covered by the same author's Obychai, pover'ia, kukhnia i napitki malorossian (Kiev, 1860). P. O. Kulish's important book on Ukrainian folklore and history, Zapiski o iuzhnoi Rusi, 2 volumes (St. Petersburg, 1856-1857) is also in this collection. The Yudin Collection also included many descriptive and historical books in French and German relating to Ukraine, such as the 17th century Description de l'Ukraine by Beauplan. The Library has the 1861 edition, as well as an English translation from 1732 and a translation into Russian by F. Ustrialov, published in St. Petersburg in 1832.


Ukrainian historians also are rather well represented in the LC collections, although some works are available only in recent editions or photoreproductions, e.g., Mykhailo Hrushevskyi and Dmytro Doroshenko, Istoriia Ukrainy-Rusy (New York, 1952-1956). Of approximately 700 books on history in the collections, more books are devoted to the most glorious period in Ukrainian history -- Cossackdom and the Hetmanate -- than to any other period. The Library of Congress has practically all of the fundamental works on this subject, including those by D.N. Bantysh- Kamenskyi, M. Kostomarov, and D. I. Evarnitskyi, as well as numerous works by other prominent Ukrainian historians and foreign scholars, e.g., Joachim Pastorius, Franciszek Gawronski and Pedro Pellicena y Camacho.


A major event in the history of LC Ukrainian accessions took place in 1958, with the acquisition of the Ostrih Bible of 1581. This was received on exchange basis from the Lenin State Library in Moscow. Production of the Bible was underwritten by Prince Konstantyn Ostroz'kyi (1526-1608), and it was printed by Ivan Fedorovych (Fedorov) (1525-1583). It is one of three copies in North America, the others being held in Canada. The Ostrih Bible thus became the oldest Ukrainian book in the Library, a distinction previously held by Petro Mohyla's Euchologion of 1646.


Locating materials relating to Ukraine can be difficult, owing to the turbulent history of the country and the confusing terminology sometimes used. Authors often use the term "Russia" in cases that do not concern Russia proper but rather present-day Ukraine. They very often use the term "Russia" or "Russian" to designate the Medieval Kiev state which was called "Rus"' but situated on the territory of present-day Ukraine. In addition, the terms "Russia" and "Russian," when used in reference to a political rather than an ethnic entity, were used for all territories of the prerevolutionary Russian Empire in the period from Peter the Great to the Revolution of 1917. These factors explain why one can find a wealth of material concerning Ukraine and Ukrainians under the headings or titles "Russia" and "Russian".


Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine calls for renewed attention to the crime of aggression. Yet, while the crime is within the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC),[1] the ICC lacks jurisdiction in the present situation. This Insight will briefly explore the history of the crime, why the ICC lacks jurisdiction in this situation, and possibilities for prosecution and increasing ICC jurisdiction over the crime. 041b061a72


  • About

    Welcome to the group! You can connect with other members, ge...

    bottom of page